Compares the name, bio and link of your profiles on different networks and shows where they differ, with each network's documented length limit where there is one. For makers who set up their profiles at different times and want a visitor to see one product, not three.
How to use it
Open each profile, copy its name, bio and link, and paste them in a row. Reavlo fetches nothing from the networks: the comparison is of what you paste.
- Name each profile after its network and paste its name, bio and link, or load the example.
- Optionally choose the profile image from your computer to see the images side by side.
- Press Run check, or Ctrl/⌘ + Enter.
- Read the findings. Each one names the profiles it is about; use "Show in text" to jump to the field.
How Reavlo tests this
Everything runs in your browser. The comparison uses the same claim extractor as the Message Consistency Checker, but the two tools are separate and have different search intents.
Name. Names that differ once case, spaces and punctuation are ignored are the same name written differently; others differ outright. Both are flagged.
Link. Links are compared by site: the address is lowercased, and "https://", "www." and the path are ignored. Two profiles that link to different sites are flagged. A handle that is not a link is not compared.
Prices and numbers. The bios are read for prices and for numbers with the word they count, and flagged when two bios give different values for the same thing. The rule is the one the Message Consistency Checker uses.
Length. A name or bio longer than the network's documented limit is flagged, counted in characters as a person sees them. The limits come from the platform-limits dataset, which holds only limits taken from official documentation. It has none for the bios of X, LinkedIn, Instagram or Facebook, so for those the tool compares and does not measure. Where the dataset has a limit, the profile field it applies to is the nearest one: the tagline of Product Hunt, the subtitle of the App Store, the short description of Google Play.
Bios. Two bios that share fewer than 15 in 100 of their content words (words of three letters or more, without common filler) are noted. Bios are written differently on purpose, so this is information, not a fault.
Empty fields. A field filled in some profiles and empty in others is noted.
Images. The image is shown on this page through your browser and is never read, uploaded or analysed. It is there so you can see at a glance whether the logo, crop and colours match.
Limits. English only. The tool compares what you paste; it cannot tell which profile is right.
Questions
Does Reavlo read my profiles from the networks?
No. Nothing is fetched. You paste the details, so the tool works for private or unpublished profiles too, and no network ever learns that you checked.
Is my profile image uploaded?
No. The image is shown in your browser from the file on your computer and goes nowhere. Reavlo does not analyse it; the images are shown side by side for you to compare.
Why does the tool not measure the bio of X or LinkedIn?
Reavlo uses only limits it can source to official documentation, and the dataset holds none for those bios. A number without a source would be folklore, so the tool says nothing about their length.
Do all bios have to be the same?
No. A bio can fit its network. The tool flags contradictions in the name, link, prices and numbers, and only notes bios that share almost no words.